THE NEWS
The Cost Of Security: The Impact Of Higher Defense Spending On Debt-Laden Nations
The Cost Of Security: The Impact Of Higher Defense Spending On Debt-Laden Nations
Authored by Robert Burrows via BondVigilantes.com,
In an era of rising geopolitical tensions, many nations are ramping up defence spending to bolster security. However, for countries already burdened with high debt, this creates a fiscal dilemma: how to fund military expansion without worsening financial instability.
Nowhere is this debate more pressing than in Europe, where Germany—historically the continent’s fiscal anchor, undertook a historic change to its fiscal policy.
The burden of debt and defence
An increase in defence spending presents a strict trade-off for heavily indebted countries. Governments must either:
-
Raise taxes – politically unpopular and potentially damaging to growth.
-
Cut other spending – risking social discontent as welfare programs, infrastructure, or education suffer.
-
Borrow more – worsening fiscal deficits and increasing interest costs.
Many western nations, including France, Belgium and the UK, already have debt-to-GDP ratios exceeding 90%, a level often associated with slower economic growth and rising debt-servicing costs. Higher interest rates make borrowing more expensive, meaning every additional dollar or euro spent on defence further strains government finances.
Germany, with its historically cautious fiscal approach, has long provided Europe with a sense of stability. But if Berlin abandons its “Schuldenbremse” (debt brake), the consequences could ripple across the entire region.
Germany’s debt brake: The last fiscal anchor in Europe is creaking!
If Germany does abandon its debt brake, two major risks emerge:
-
Loss of fiscal discipline across Europe
-
Germany has historically been the economic stabiliser of the eurozone, often pushing for fiscal restraint in countries like Italy, Spain, and France. If Germany embraces deficit spending, other nations may follow suit, leading to a more relaxed approach to debt across Europe.
-
This could weaken confidence in European government bonds, raising borrowing costs for highly indebted nations.
-
-
Increased risk of inflation and market instability
-
More deficit spending will likely fuel inflationary pressures
-
Investors will demand higher yields on European sovereign bonds, putting additional strain on public finances.
-
A fractured European fiscal policy could weaken the euro, making imports more expensive and eroding purchasing power.
-
What happens next?
-
Tighter monetary policy: If increased government spending fuels inflation, central banks may be forced to keep interest rates higher for longer, slowing economic growth.
-
Greater EU fiscal integration: If Germany relaxes its debt rules, there may be renewed calls for collective EU borrowing (like the COVID recovery fund) to share the burden. Will the Europhiles finally get their wish, or will we see a slow Balkanisation of Europe as high outstanding debt forces countries’ hands?
-
Market reactions: Investors could reassess European sovereign risk, leading to rising bond yields, particularly for countries with weaker fiscal positions. This could introduce a new level of uncertainty and volatility into the European market.
Ultimately, while stronger defence capabilities are necessary in an uncertain world, the financial cost could be as destabilising as what is raging on Europe’s doorstep.
If Germany, Europe’s traditional fiscal anchor, shifts toward looser debt policies, the eurozone could face a new era of fiscal uncertainty—one that challenges the economic stability of the entire continent.
For now, the fiscal boost will be seen as a positive, higher growth, higher inflation and a stronger euro.
Also, don’t forget that it’s not just Germany increasing spending. Spain, Italy, Belgium, and Portugal need to increase defence spending considerably from here, which should fuel growth and inflation further.
Source: NATO, Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2024)
The UK is in a similarly challenging position. The UK government must carefully navigate its foreign policy to maintain strong economic and security ties with both Europe and the US, balancing conflicting interests. It seeks close trade and regulatory alignment with the EU to protect economic and financial stability while avoiding commitments that could constrain its post-Brexit sovereignty.
At the same time, it prioritises a deep security and economic partnership with the US, aligning on defence and geopolitical strategy, even when American policies diverge from European interests. This balancing act requires diplomatic agility to avoid being caught between two major allies with differing trade, defence, and global governance priorities.
With the tectonic plates shifting, time will tell how this all unfolds.
Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/15/2025 – 09:20
Here’s what happened during President Donald Trump’s eighth week in office
Former Disney star claims porn career has people treating her with ‘more respect’
Dutch woman goes viral for videos of her Irish boyfriend’s love for Guinness
Juul Heijnen is famous for her TikTok handle “Juul & The Irish boyfriend,” where she shares videos of her beau and his affinity for Guinness beer.
Lefty NYC Council eases process for illegal migrants to get ID residency cards
The NYC Council’s woke majority passed legislation this week making it simpler for illegal migrants to score already-easy-to-get, city-issued residency ID cards for free benefits.
UFC Fight Night predictions: Full prelim, main card picks for Vettori vs. Dolidze
UFC put together fights with huge favorites in potential squash spots.
A MacBook Pro can be yours for under $400 if you hurry
Update: our stock is already running low
Fox News AI Newsletter: ‘Digital twin’ danger
Mapping Europe’s Coming Population Crash
Mapping Europe’s Coming Population Crash
This map, via Visual Capitalist’s Pallavi Rao, shows the projected change in population levels for every European country between now and the year 2100.
Data is sourced from the UN World Population Prospects 2024, using their medium variant estimates.
ℹ️ The medium variant scenario means the UN thinks this is the most likely outcome, taking into account birth and death rates, and migration patterns.
Ranked: Europe’s Population Change by Country
For the last few decades Europe’s birth rates have fallen below replacement rate (which keeps population levels the same), and this will only accelerate going into the future.
As a result, most European countries will see their population fall between now and the year 2100.
Country | ISO Code | 2025–2100 Population Change |
% Change |
---|---|---|---|
🇬🇧 UK | GBR | +4.8M | +7% |
🇫🇷 France | FRA | +1.8M | +3% |
🇸🇪 Sweden | SWE | +710.3K | +7% |
🇨🇭 Switzerland | CHE | +158.7K | +2% |
🇱🇺 Luxembourg | LUX | +67.5K | +10% |
🇲🇨 Monaco | MCO | +9.1K | +24% |
🇱🇮 Liechtenstein | LIE | +3.5K | +9% |
🇸🇲 San Marino | SMR | -2.4K | -7% |
🇮🇪 Ireland | IRL | -21.9K | 0% |
🇦🇩 Andorra | AND | -35.7K | -43% |
🇮🇸 Iceland | ISL | -35.7K | -9% |
🇩🇰 Denmark | DNK | -139.3K | -2% |
🇲🇹 Malta | MLT | -185.5K | -34% |
🇳🇴 Norway | NOR | -209.5K | -4% |
🇲🇪 Montenegro | MNE | -306.7K | -48% |
🇸🇮 Slovenia | SVN | -485.0K | -23% |
🇪🇪 Estonia | EST | -518.7K | -39% |
🇽🇰 Kosovo | XKX | -579.4K | -35% |
🇧🇪 Belgium | BEL | -697.8K | -6% |
🇳🇱 Netherlands | NLD | -839.3K | -5% |
🇱🇻 Latvia | LVA | -928.2K | -50% |
🇲🇰 North Macedonia | MKD | -950.8K | -52% |
🇫🇮 Finland | FIN | -1.0M | -18% |
🇲🇩 Moldova | MDA | -1.5M | -50% |
🇦🇱 Albania | ALB | -1.6M | -57% |
🇱🇹 Lithuania | LTU | -1.6M | -57% |
🇵🇹 Portugal | PRT | -1.7M | -16% |
🇭🇷 Croatia | HRV | -1.7M | -44% |
🇦🇹 Austria | AUT | -1.7M | -19% |
🇧🇦 Bosnia & Herzegovina | BIH | -1.8M | -56% |
🇸🇰 Slovakia | SVK | -2.1M | -37% |
🇭🇺 Hungary | HUN | -2.2M | -23% |
🇨🇿 Czechia | CZE | -2.4M | -22% |
🇷🇸 Serbia | SRB | -3.0M | -45% |
🇧🇬 Bulgaria | BGR | -3.2M | -47% |
🇬🇷 Greece | GRC | -3.7M | -37% |
🇧🇾 Belarus | BLR | -4.6M | -52% |
🇷🇴 Romania | ROU | -8.1M | -43% |
🇩🇪 Germany | DEU | -13.1M | -16% |
🇪🇸 Spain | ESP | -14.8M | -31% |
🇷🇺 Russia | RUS | -17.6M | -12% |
🇵🇱 Poland | POL | -18.8M | -49% |
🇮🇹 Italy | ITA | -23.8M | -40% |
🇺🇦 Ukraine | UKR | -23.8M | -61% |
🇪🇺 Europe | EUR | -152.2M | -20% |
Naturally the most populous countries on the continent will see large swings, like Germany (-13.8 million), Poland (-18.8 million), and Italy (-23.8 million).
Regionally, Eastern Europe has seen declines since the 1990s, and that trend will only accelerate as this century progresses. Russia and Ukraine will together lose 40 million people by 2100.
Nevertheless, migration (both within the continent and from outside the region) can boost population levels.
For the UK (+4.8 million) and France (+1.8 million), this will lead to population growth rather than declines.
However, this is a small group. The UN projects that only seven European countries will have a larger population in 2100 than in 2025.
Important to remember that these are all estimates and can vary depending on the source. Eurostat (the official data source for the EU) has more countries in the green than the UN, though their estimates were made in 2022.
What Does This Mean For Europe?
A population decline is not something most economies are built for. Fewer people equals shrinking consumer demand, critical to the economy.
It also means a smaller tax net, which directly funds expansive social security measures that Europe is famous for.
For the last few decades migration into the region (from Asia and the Middle East) has kept the population growing.
However, the booster effect from international migration is set to drop off a lot closer than most expect. Eurostat projects that 2026 will be Europe’s peak population point, after which levels will begin to trend down.
Need more Europe info on your radar? Check out Europe’s Most In-Demand Jobs in case you’re looking to move.
Tyler Durden
Sat, 03/15/2025 – 08:45